Cases 11 - 20 of 348
McGraw v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Keith McGraw
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Diaz and Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Lupis et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
Lupis, Jericka Baez, Holly Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez-Diaz v. Borreiro
as 23-42
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant / Appellee:
Borreiro, Officers, Lance, Officers, Lucheese, Officers and others
Todie v. NYS DOCCs Parole Div. QNS Ballroop et al
as 1:2022cv07960
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Todie
Defendant:
NYS DOCCs Parole Div. QNS Ballroop, Ballroops Assistant Diaz, Supervisor Gonzazes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Donahue et al
as 6:2022cv06559
Plaintiff:
Frederick Diaz
Defendant:
James F. Donahue, Christopher Yehl, Timothy J. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez-Diaz v. Doe
as 22-3086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, Warden of MCC/NY, Beard, Captain of MCC/NY, Monge, C.O. of MCC/NY and others
Barcliff et al v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv09762
Plaintiff:
Jackie Barcliff, Isaiah Charles, Jonathan Contreras and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Monroe County et al
as 1:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Julian O. Diaz
Defendant:
Monroe County and Todd Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez-Diaz v. Borreiro et al
as 1:2022cv08708
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant:
Borreiro, Lance, Lucheese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Jacquez et al
as 1:2022cv08443
Plaintiff:
Yudi Diaz
Defendant:
Rikers Island Jacquez, Williams, Thorn and others
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
