Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Nicholson v. Hammond et al
as 9:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
James W. Nicholson
Defendant:
M. Hammond, Arthur Dirie and Captain Doppert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Schneiderman
as 1:2012cv01172
Petitioner:
Diallo Hammond
Respondent:
Eric Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv01318
Plaintiff:
Gary Warren
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Jeff McKoy, Brandon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv07638
Plaintiff:
Alvin Banks
Defendant:
The United States of America, Metropolitan Correctional Center, V. Hurtado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv06613
Plaintiff:
Alvin Banks
Defendant:
The United States of America, Metropolitan Correctional Center, V. Hurtado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melecio v. Fischer et al
as 9:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
Julio Melecio
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Jerry Janiec, K. Apple Hac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
Tammi Eldridge, Joyce Powell, Jazmin Shelton and others
Defendant:
E. Williams, E. Williams, M. Capra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. United States
as 1:2008cv01195
Plaintiff:
Willie Hammond
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hammond v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv02147
Petitioner:
Willie Hammond
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Matos v. McKinney et al
as 9:2007cv00336
Plaintiff:
Hector Matos, Jr.
Defendant:
T. McKinney, T. Smith, McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
