Cases 11 - 20 of 6,124
Sena v. Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Alexis Sena
Defendant:
Torres, Villafane, Aloi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogle v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
John Ogle
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Surgeon John Doe and Daniel F. Matruscello, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xebastian v. Osborn Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Judas Xebastian
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. Moore et al
as 3:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Daris Best
Defendant:
Moore, Martin, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Frisina et al
as 9:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
D. Frisina, S. Jackson, Phil Melecio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin v. RMSC Warden (John Doe) et al
as 1:2024cv04098
Plaintiff:
Heaven Benjamin
Defendant:
RMSC Warden (John Doe) and RMSC Grievance Worker (Jane Doe)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Darnell Hicks
Defendant:
Captain Zimmerman, Ossining NY OVAC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
