Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Chambers v. Lombardo et al
as 1:2017cv07557
Plaintiff:
Gary Chambers
Defendant:
Robert Lombardo, Josh Taylor and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pellot-Castellano v. Chapdelaine et al
as 3:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Pellot-Castellano
Defendant:
Michael Calderon, Josh Burns, Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Uhler
as 1:2016cv01402
Petitioner:
Josh Brown
Respondent:
Donald G. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nabatov v. Kurdi et al
as 1:2015cv02211
Plaintiff:
Steven Nabatov
Defendant:
Harris Kurdi, D. Fauvre, Ron Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. One (name unknown) Named U.S. Magistrate Judge et al
as 6:2014cv06141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One (name unknown) Named U.S. Magistrate Judge, One or More Unknown Names U.S. Agents, Charles Schumer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genco v. Westchester County
as 14-508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank Genco, AKA Frank Goldstein
Defendant - Appellee:
Westchester County, Correct Care Solutions LLC, Correct Care Solutions New York and others
Greene et al v. Schriro et al
as 1:2013cv06737
Plaintiff:
Aaron Greene, Jeff Greene, Desiree Greene and others
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Luis Rivera, Purvis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Heidelberger, M.D. et al
as 1:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lewis
Defendant:
Edwin Heidelberger, M.D., Janet Collesano, Lorretta Trask and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Genco v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2012cv06712
Plaintiff:
Frank Genco
Defendant:
Westchester County, Correct Care Solutions LLC, Correct Care Solutions New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of New York
as 12-61
Petitioner - Appellant:
Josh Brown
Respondent - Appellee:
State of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
