Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Burrell v. Oneida County
as 22-2687
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ako K. Burrell
Defendant / Appellee: Jennifer Sowers, Oneida County Dietician, FKA John Doe and Trinity Food Service Group Incorporated, Oneida County Food Service
Defendant: Robert Maciol, (Oneida County) Sheriff, Robert Swenszkowski, Under Sheriff of (Oneida County), Oneida County and others
Kaminski v. Connecticut
as 22-2084
Plaintiff / Appellant: John S. Kaminski
Defendant / Appellee: Dr. Byron Kennedy, DOC - Director of Medical, Official Capacity, Dr. Johnny Wright, DOC - Regional Medical Director, Official Capacity, Dr. Cory Freston, DOC - Assistant Regional Director, Official Capacity and others
Defendant: State of Connecticut, C/O A/G William Tong, Angel Quiros, Commissioner, Dept of Corrections and Dr, Chief Exec. Officer Andrew Agwunobi, UConn Health Center/John Dempsey Hospital
Hall v. Annucci
as 22-2031
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ralph Hall
Defendant / Appellee: Anthony Annucci, DOCCS Commissioner, in his official and personal capacity, Griffin, GHCF Superintendent, in his official and personal capacity, Dr. Bentivegna, GHCF Medical Supervisor, in his official and personal capacity and others
Defendant: GHCF Unknown Nursing Staff, in their official and personal capacities as Employees at Green Haven Correctional Facility between the September 26, 2017 date and October 30, 2017 and unnamed because of facility failure to disclose their identities
Bridges v. The State of New York Correctional Services
as 22-1659
Plaintiff / Appellant: Donnell Bridges
Defendant / Appellee: The State of New York Correctional Services, and the Employee's that is name in this civil action, the Department of Medical Services, Dr. Marc Janis, Physician, Thomas Griffin, Superintendent and others
Defendant: Mount Vernon Hospital, the Owner and The City of Mount Vernon
Negron v. Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00905
Plaintiff: Carlos Negron
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Warden of DOC, Medical Dorector of DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Oneida County
as 22-686
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ako K. Burrell
Defendant / Appellee: Robert Maciol, (Oneida County) Sheriff, Robert Swenszkowski, Under Sheriff of (Oneida County), Gregory Pfliger, Chief of Oneida County Jail and others
Defendant: Oneida County, Mello Testa, (Oneida County) Director of Purchasing, Shelley Nowak, (Oneida County) Assistant Director of Purchasing and others
Quint v. Martin
as 22-619
Plaintiff / Appellant: Richard R. Quint, Mr.
Defendant / Appellee: Martin, Warden, in both their official and individual capacities, Hackett, LT., in both their official and individual capacities, Raden, Dr., in both their official and individual capacities and others
Defendant: Spiedght, C/O, Tara Philips and Jack Russo, Counselor, in both their official and individual capacities
Quint v. Martin
as 22-567
Plaintiff / Appellant: Richard R. Quint, Mr.
Defendant / Appellee: Martin, Warden, in both their official and individual capacities, Hackett, LT., in both their official and individual capacities, Raden, Dr., in both their official and individual capacities and others
Defendant: Spiedght, C/O, Tara Philips and Jack Russo, Counselor, in both their official and individual capacities
Perez v. Annucci
as 22-11
Plaintiff / Appellant: Julio Perez
Defendant / Appellee: DOCCS Commissioner Anthony Annucci, in his official and personal capacity, GHCF Superintendent Griffin, in his official and personal capacity, Dr. Silver, GHCF Medical Provider, in his official and personal capacity and others
Quint v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01695
Plaintiff: Richard R. Quint
Defendant: Martin, Hackett, Spiedght and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?