Cases 11 - 20 of 195
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gawlik v. Reis et al
as 3:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jan M. Gawlik
Defendant:
Jennifer Reis, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Long et al
as 3:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Kyle Wood
Defendant:
D. Long and T. Tralli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Masucci v. Greene et al
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kristie Masucci
Defendant:
USA, Diane Easter, Robert Thomas Greene, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Burkman v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 3:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
David W. Burkman
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Michael D. Carvajal, Kevin Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Prickett v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00459
Petitioner:
Joel D. Prickett
Defendant:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Velasco v. Vaughan-Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Victor Velasco
Defendant:
Vaughan-Williams, Losty, Hayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Andre Cogdell and Andre D. Cogdell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sakon v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
John Alan Sakon
Defendant:
John Johnson, F Perrone, Bruce D. Skehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santo v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Francis Santo
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jennifer Reis, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
