Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Babulsky v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00865
Plaintiff: James Babulsky
Defendant: Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TeekaSingh v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00694
Plaintiff: Osbert TeekaSingh
Defendant: Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barney v. Semple et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00685
Plaintiff: Jeremy Louis Barney
Defendant: Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toliver v. Semple et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01899
Plaintiff: Sean Toliver
Defendant: Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uhl v. Sullivan Co Jail Medical Dept. Staff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv06923
Plaintiff: Miguel Angel Uhl
Defendant: Sullivan Co Jail Medical Dept. Staff, Wendy, Jamie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv05650
Plaintiff: Prince Muhammad
Defendant: New York City, Mary Bassett, Mental Health Lawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv05102
Petitioner: Prince D.M. Muhammad
Respondent: New York City, Mary Bassett and Vincent Miccoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv03602
Defendant: Mary Bassett, Mental Health Lawyers, Vincent Miccoli and others
Plaintiff: Mr. Prince Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorpe v. Village of Cambridge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2013cv00902
Plaintiff: Scott M. Thorpe
Defendant: Eugene McKenna , William Breyear and Aron Bassett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bassett v. Barkley
as 6:2012cv06052
Plaintiff: Patrick George Bassett
Defendant: Barkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?