Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rahman v. Schriro et al
as 7:2013cv06095
Plaintiff:
Esteban Herrera, Sean Smith, Malik Rahman and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Dora Schriro, Warden Luis Rivera, Deputy Warden Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Day v. Ercole
as 13-1825
Petitioner - Appellant:
Phenroy Day
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert E. Ercole, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility
Hardy v. Doe
as 13-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vensel Hardy
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe, Working 5 Company, John Doe, Working 2 Company, Knowiki, I believe his name is and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sgt. Christina LoVerde, Daniel Leonard, Sean Warner and others
Day v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2013cv00802
Plaintiff:
Robert Day
Defendant:
The City of Yonkers, O'Connor, Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Warden Department of Correction City of New York (O.B.C.C.) et al
as 1:2012cv08995
Plaintiff:
Naphtali Campbell
Defendant:
Warden Department of Correction City of New York (O.B.C.C.) and Officers of the intake area for 6 days non house
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dais v. Senior Parole Officer Degal et al
as 1:2012cv00629
Plaintiff:
Willie Dais
Defendant:
Senior Parole Officer Degal and New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Maldanado et al
as 3:2012cv00802
Petitioner:
Jason Mourice Day
Respondent:
George Maldanado and James E. Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dais v. City of Buffalo New York et al
as 6:2011cv06338
Plaintiff:
Willie Dais
Defendant:
Omar Rodriguez, Sean Zoll, Rob Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
