Cases 31 - 40 of 579
Tufano v. American Arbitration Association et al
as 7:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association, Jeffrey K. Davis, Esq., Adam Starowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giovinco v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv09892
Petitioner:
Frank Giovinco
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sherman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frank Sherman, III
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Dannhauser
as 22-2733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jelahn Julian Griffith
Defendant / Appellee:
Jess Dannhauser, Frank Cresciullo, Albert A. Benjamin and others
Thomas v. Dannhauser
as 22-2734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tashima Elaine Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Jess Dannhauser, Frank Cresciullo, Albert A. Benjamin and others
Giovinco v. McFarland et al
as 1:2022cv08829
Petitioner:
Frank J. Giovinco
Respondent:
Patrick Mcfarland and RRM New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Stango et al
as 3:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lewis
Defendant:
Charles Stango, Corneilius Kelly, Frank Iannotti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Dannhauser et al
as 1:2022cv05864
Plaintiff:
Tashima Elaine Thomas
Defendant:
Jess Dannhauser, Frank Cresciullo, Albert A. Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffith v. Dannhauser et al
as 1:2022cv05865
Plaintiff:
Jelahn Julian Griffith
Defendant:
Jess Dannhauser, Frank Cresciullo, Albert A. Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
