Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Lane v. New York State Office of Menta
as 12-1840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre Lane
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Office of Mental Health and New York City Department of Corrections
Hodge v. Sidorowicz
as 12-1376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Hodge
Defendant:
Timothy Whalen, Carl J. Keoningsmann, Lester Wright and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Wladyslaw Sidorowicz, Dr., Lynn Lilley, Shron Lilley and others
Barnes v. Abdullah et al
as 1:2011cv08168
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Barnes
Defendant:
M. Abdullah, A.M. Iceari, D. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. NYS Office of Mental Health et al
as 1:2011cv01941
Plaintiff:
Andre Lane
Defendant:
NYS Office of Mental Health and NYC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean-Laurent v. Lane et al
as 9:2011cv00186
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jean-Laurent
Defendant:
Lane, Briggs, Tyndall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. NYS Governor Cuomo, M. Andrew et al
as 1:2011cv00598
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr
Defendant:
NYS Employee P.O. G. Lane, NYS Executive Division of Parole and NYS Governor Cuomo, M. Andrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2011cv00005
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Carr, Dr. Cohen, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Damion Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardy v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2010cv08540
Plaintiff:
Damion Hardy
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. City of Yonker
as 10-4112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kim Carl
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Yonkers, Yonkers Police Department, Brian McCormack, Police Officer and others
Cuadrado v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07261
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cuadrado
Defendant:
City of New York, Raymond Kelly, Detective Steve Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
