Cases 31 - 40 of 298
Batiz v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Batiz
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv01910
Petitioner:
Damon Wheeler
Respondent:
R. Maldonado, Warden and U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blango v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Blango
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Brown
Defendant:
Edward Maldonado, Kevin Roy and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Kristine Barone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Blekis et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Blekis, Marcellin, Craig Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maldonado v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
Franklyn M. Maldonado
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, A.M. Martin, R. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Beckert et al
as 3:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Beckert, Ross, Marcellin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv10566
Plaintiff:
Franklyn M. Maldonado
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, A.M. Martin, R. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Sergent Reid et al
as 1:2023cv09719
Plaintiff:
Abderanman Mayo
Defendant:
Sergent Reid, Sergent Carrington, M Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
