Cases 41 - 50 of 1,961
Sloane v. Rowland et al
as 6:2024cv06103
Plaintiff:
Derek Sloane
Defendant:
C.O. W. M. Rowland, E. Mathews, C.O. A. Altta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Matthew Davis
Respondent:
E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Labarge et al
as 9:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sincere Smith
Defendant:
Labarge, C.O. A.N. Martin, C.O. A.U. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lowerre
as 9:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Wardell Watson
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Piper et al
as 7:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Adam E. Murphy
Defendant:
Correctin Officer Piper, Orange County Sheriffs Office and Orange County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Marvin E. Owens
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Brian Figueroa, Dinardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. State of Connecticut Office of the Public Defender et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Marvin E. Owens
Defendant:
State of Connecticut Office of the Public Defender, Tracy Jo Mathis, Michael Paris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Struble v. Tope
as 6:2024cv06036
Petitioner:
David E. Struble
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Struble v. Tope
as 9:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
David E. Struble
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
