Cases 41 - 50 of 64
McMahon v. Lee
as 1:2017cv00041
Petitioner:
Michael McMahon
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cosby v. Laffarge et al
as 3:2016cv02034
Plaintiff:
Howard Cosby
Defendant:
Laffarge, Peterson, Deller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Whiteford et al
as 6:2016cv06805
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Brooks, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew Whiteford, Charles Miller, Robert Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Federal Court United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York et al
as 2:2016cv05753
Defendant:
Federal Court United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Carol McMahon and Cathy Vukovich
Plaintiff:
Keysean L. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. The Rockly County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2015cv08768
Plaintiff:
William K. McMahon
Defendant:
The Rockly County Correctional Center, Louis Falco, III, Anthony J. Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. McMahon, et al
as 1:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boykin
Defendant:
Colleen McMahon and Kenneth M. Karas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Engles v. Souza et al
as 9:2014cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles
Defendant:
Mark T. Souza, Robert P. Bause, Stephen G. Cambell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Schnederman et al
as 1:2014cv07500
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harvey
Defendant:
Schnederman, Valentino, Kahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Danner et al
as 6:2014cv06347
Petitioner:
Darnell Hunter
Respondent:
Robert Danner, James McMahon, Fay Kwiatkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payen v. The, F-B-I, Proseutor et al
as 1:2014cv01212
Plaintiff:
Laguerre Payen
Defendant:
The, F-B-I, Proseutor, The B-O-P: Medical Psychology, The District McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
