Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Wesley-Rosa v. Joseph
as 1:2018cv01431
Petitioner:
Jacqueline Wesley-Rosa
Respondent:
Superintendent Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosa v. USA
as 1:2017cv07132
Petitioner:
Gilberto Rosa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. Nunez et al
as 1:2017cv09337
Plaintiff:
Curtis Brown
Defendant:
Rosa A. Nunez, Renell Hamilton, Tina M. Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Kahn et al
as 3:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jayvell-Jones Washington
Defendant:
Maria Araujo Kahn, Robert Quintanilla, Jr., Ivan Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera v. Banks et al
as 1:2017cv07691
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Herrera
Defendant:
Steven Banks, Iris Rodriguez, Jason Hansman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Nichols et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv04269
Plaintiff:
Curtis Nichols, Avery Fortner, Wesley Johnson and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, K. Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv04071
Plaintiff:
Curtis Nichols, Avery Fortner, Wesley Johnson and others
Defendant:
Comm. Joseph Ponte, EMTC Warden Keisha Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley-Rosa v. Kaplan
as 1:2017cv01127
Respondent:
Sabrina Kaplan
Petitioner:
Jacqueline Wesley-Rosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crichlow v. Fischer et al
as 9:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant:
John Doe, Daniel Baver, Chief Medical Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Rosa v. Nalls-Castillo et al
as 1:2016cv09492
Petitioner:
Ramon De Jesus De La Rosa
Respondent:
Tish Nalls-Castillo, Christopher Shanahan, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
