Cases 41 - 50 of 2,912
Moore v. Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
as 9:2023cv01620
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gooden v. Titus
as 6:2023cv06709
Petitioner:
United States Ex Rel Karl Gooden
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Summers v. Burnett et al
as 7:2023cv10784
Plaintiff:
Basyir Summers
Defendant:
Superintendent Edward Burnett, Sergeant Cicala, Correctional Officer Christopher A. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Safran v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01519
Petitioner:
David Jeffrey Safran
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reibel v. Superintendent Hill
as 6:2023cv06671
Petitioner:
Michael J. Reibel
Respondent:
Superintendent Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sloley v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Maxmillian Sloley and BX
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Correction Officer Joyce, P.A. Milov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niles v. Lowen
as 1:2023cv10145
Petitioner:
Paul Niles
Respondent:
Superintendent Ernest J. Lowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ott v. Superintendent Wyoming Corr. Facility
as 6:2023cv06653
Petitioner:
Anthony Ott
Respondent:
Superintendent Wyoming Corr. Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Lilley
as 1:2023cv09613
Petitioner:
Terrell Jenkins
Respondent:
Superintendent Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caruthers v. Uhler
as 1:2023cv01124
Petitioner:
Michael Caruthers
Respondent:
Superintendent Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
