Cases 51 - 60 of 63,439
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04559
Plaintiff:
Theryn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Roman v. Correction Sergeant Thomas et al
as 9:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Roman
Defendant:
Correction Sergeant Thomas, Correction Officer Thomas and Correction Officer John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velazquez v. Burnett
as 1:2024cv04524
Petitioner:
David Velazquez
Respondent:
Edward Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booth v. A&E Television Networks et al
as 1:2024cv04496
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Booth
Defendant:
A&E Television Networks, Court TV, Chastity Josephina Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Squire v. New
as 2:2024cv04174
Petitioner:
Kashon Squire
Respondent:
Mr. Mickcorr Ramond New
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. City of Rochester, NY RPD et al
as 6:2024cv06355
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Johnson
Defendant:
City of Rochester, NY RPD, Officer ID# ROC 1847 and Officer D. Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewell v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv04505
Petitioner:
David Sewell
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01040
Petitioner:
Pierre Rodriguez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lawson v. Tong et al
as 3:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
William Tong, Sandra Arenas, Edward Miner Lamont, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Department of Correction
as 3:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortega
Defendant:
Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
