Cases 61 - 70 of 902
Moore v. Parsons et al
as 3:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Defendant:
Ryan Parsons, Peter Pietraroia, Steven Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. All cops since 1992 to 96 et al
as 1:2022cv06493
Plaintiff:
Tarnell Leon Jones
Defendant:
All cops since 1992 to 96, 1971 to 1996 to no NYC all cops, All other state 49 other states and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Jones
as 22-2713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
Janice Jones, Jacqueline Mackey and Anthony Annucci
Nellons v. Jones
as 9:2022cv01031
Petitioner:
Ricardo D. Nellons
Respondent:
Gerard Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Capra
as 6:2022cv06405
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Doe
as 22-2073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Jane Doe, New York City Criminal Justice Coordinator
McBride v. Jones
as 22-2070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Titus McBride
Defendant / Appellee:
G. Jones, Superintendent, D. Gleason, Deputy Superintendent of Security and A. Frederickson, Deputy Superintendent of Program
Ahmed v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv08007
Plaintiff:
Ishtiaq Ahmed
Defendant:
Richard Taylor, Natasha Moseley-Jones, Viodelys Brathwaite and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00945
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Robinson
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Gerald Jones, Kelly Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
