Cases 61 - 70 of 1,047
Smith v. Labarge et al
as 7:2023cv10264
Plaintiff:
Sincere Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Labarge, C.O. A.N. Martin, C.O. A.U. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
Franklyn M. Maldonado
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, A.M. Martin, R. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv10566
Plaintiff:
Franklyn M. Maldonado
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, A.M. Martin, R. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dannett v. Conrad et al
as 3:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Dannett
Defendant:
Conrad, Maura Atkinson, Foote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Devin O'Neill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Martin, Oles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaseen v. Deml et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
King Kaseen
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml, Phil Scott, Jennifer Sprafke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07760
Petitioner:
Martin Ross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mitchell v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Rachel Fontaine, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv06657
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Detective Jeffrey Carroll, Police Officer Frank Feliciano, Narcotics Det. 25th John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Uhler et al
as 9:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
London Lucas
Defendant:
D. Uhler, J. Messenger, R. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
