Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Curry v. Griffin
as 12-2058
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Curry
Respondent:
Department of Correctional Services, Thomas Spota, District Attorney, Suffolk County and Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General, State of New York
Respondent - Appellee:
Patrick Griffin, Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Robert Dennison, Chairman of Parole, Marcia R. Kucera, Assistant District Attorney, Suffolk County, Steven A. Hovani, Appeals Chief, Suffolk County and others
Neal v. Yelich
as 1:2012cv03022
Petitioner:
Richard Neal
Respondent:
Yelich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Rock et al
as 9:2012cv00459
Plaintiff:
Michael Perkins
Defendant:
David A. Rock, William Hungerford, Neal J. Lavigne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Rock et al
as 9:2011cv01119
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
David Rock, Albert Prack, Gerald J. Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ison v. Douglas et al
as 1:2011cv00763
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ison
Defendant:
Douglas, Neal, S. Khahaifa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ison v. Douglas et al
as 9:2011cv00873
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ison
Defendant:
Douglas, Neal, S. Khahaifa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin v. USA
as 1:2011cv00534
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Neal Benjamin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Curry v. Schneiderman
as 11-76
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Curry
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York State, Robert Dennison, Chairman of Parole, Thomas Spota, District Attorney, Suffolk County and others
Neal v. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv07707
Plaintiff:
Terrell Neal
Defendant:
The Manhattan District Attorney's Office and The State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Strange et al
as 3:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Sadler
Defendant:
Mark Strange and Peter Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
