Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Leadingham v. Michigan of Correction SCDD Supervisor et al
as 1:2012cv00616
Plaintiff:
Brian Kenneth Leadingham
Defendant:
Michigan of Correction SCDD Supervisor, Rebca Springett, Brigget Grump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eze v. Scott
as 12-129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis Eze
Defendant - Appellee:
Marcia Scott, John Graham, Deputy, Robert Victory, Officer and others
Gillard v. Smith
as 11-5099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary Gillard
Defendant - Appellee:
Nancy Smith, Nurse Administrator, Upstate Correctional Facility, Mario Douyon DeAzevedo, Doctor, Upstate Correctional Facility, Candy C. Atkinson, Nurse, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Carl v. Griffin
as 11-1736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kim Carl
Defendant - Appellee:
James Nichols, Superintendent, Cestaro, Lieutenant, Urbanski, Lieutenant and others
Phelan v. Lichva et al
as 9:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant:
Nichole Lichva, Christina Calabrese, Judge Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Panayoty v. Annucci et al
as 9:2011cv00159
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci , John Nuttall , Lucien LeClaire, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Bonilla and Anthony Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2011cv00593
Plaintiff:
Warren Keith Davis
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Richards, Aneem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eze v. Scott et al
as 1:2010cv01017
Plaintiff:
Louis Eze
Defendant:
Marcia Scott, John Graham, Robert Victory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Artu
as 10-5014
Petitioner - Appellant:
William Marshall Nichols
Respondent - Appellee:
Dale Artus, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
Scarbrough v. Nichols, et al
as 9:2010cv01370
Plaintiff:
Lester Lee Scarbrough, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Clintsman, Melissa A. Cook, Jeffery Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
