Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Forbes v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Forbes
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Genao v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Gabino Genao
Defendant:
Elvis Ruiz, Jr., Kenneth Stukes, Robin Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. USA
as 3:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Timothy Forbes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lubrano et al v. Morgenstern et al
as 1:2022cv04987
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Lubrano
Defendant:
Esther Mickey Morgenstern, Eric Gonzales, NYC Mayor Eric Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Encarnacion v. Collado et al
as 9:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Defendant:
J. Collado, Anthony Annucci, A. Polizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06465
Defendant:
Rochester Police Department, Patrick Giancursio, Matt Balch and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06457
Defendant:
Inv. Eliud Rodriguez, Officer Perelli, City of Rochester and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Forbes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00452
Defendant:
D. Venettozzi, Anthony J. Annucci and Thomas Forbes
Plaintiff:
Edward Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00451
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, K.G. Henley and Anthony J. Annucci
Plaintiff:
Edward Randolph
Consolidated Defendant:
D. Venettozzi and Thomas Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Officer John Doe et al
as 6:2018cv06700
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Sgt. Anthony Bongiovani and City of Rochester
Plaintiff:
Robert Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
