Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Buster v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Douglas William Buster
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Joe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLarty v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01353
Petitioner:
Douglas McLarty
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gee v. Stodemaier et al
as 6:2023cv06720
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wyatt Gee
Defendant:
Lt. Douglas Stodemaier, Chemung County Jail, Dr. Snellgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Stodemaier et al
as 1:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
Jebb Baldwin
Defendant:
Sergeant Douglas Stodemaier, Doctor Snellgrove and Lieutenant Anthony Vitucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Barroga et al
as 3:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Chazantine Griffin
Defendant:
Marissa Barroga, Debra Cruz, Julie Leschinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Uconn Health et al
as 3:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Christopher Calhoun
Defendant:
Uconn Health, Ersilda Ajce, Natalie J Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamson et al v. D'Amore et al
as 9:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
David Adamson, Henry Barrera, James Caruso and others
Defendant:
Michael D'Amore, Danielle C. Medbury, William S. Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Kopp
as 2:2023cv05039
Petitioner:
Mr. Saheim A. Douglas
Respondent:
Ms. M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bramble v. Hynes et al
as 1:2023cv05141
Plaintiff:
Reuben Bramble
Defendant:
Mr. Charles H. Hynes, Mr. Flink, Ms. Julie Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
