Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Delaney v. Pennel et al
as 1:2024cv05676
Defendant:
Laborers International Union of North America, LIUNA 477, George Alarm, Laidlaw Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milton v. Osbron CI
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Marcus Milton
Defendant:
Osborn CI and Osbron CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
William H. Brown
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Smith, Jr. II and Charles D. Smith, Jr II
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar v. Osborn CI et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Ben Omar
Defendant:
Osborn CI and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Mrs. Hannah Sullivan, Warden, Osborne CI, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ukers v. Commissioner et al
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ukers
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Kanay, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wang v. Quiros
as 23-235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lishan Wang
Defendant / Appellee:
Marie Charles, Nurse/NA of MacDougall CI and Harmon, Correctional Officer (CO), MacDougall CI
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, DOC Commissioner, Nick Rodriguez, District Administrator, Rollin Cook, Former DOC Commissioner and others
McClain v. Semple
as 22-485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tajah S. McClain
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Ventrella, BSN, RN
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Commissioner of Department of Corrections and Scott Erfe, Warden of Cheshire CI
Carilli v. Semple et al
as 3:2019cv01922
Defendant:
Moore, Peter Robinson, James Smyth and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Carilli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
