Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lovett v. Bennett
as 1:2022cv05462
Plaintiff:
Steven J Lovett
Defendant:
Acting Supt. Susie Bennett, Shane Topel, Kevin Darling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darling v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00193
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Darling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Abreu v. Lake
as 18-918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
James F. Donahue, Deputy Superintendent for Mental Health Services; Marcy Correctional Facility, Justin J. Thomas, Superintendent; Marcy Correctional Facility, Alfred J. Maunz, Sergeant; Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Mitch Lake, Director; Bureau of Mental Health Services, Bryan Hilton, Assistant Commissioner, Mrs. Sanpietro, Unit Chief of OMH, AKA Santopietro and others
Abreu v. Lake
as 18-433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Mitch Lake, Director; Bureau of Mental Health Services, James F. Donahue, Deputy Superintendent for Mental Health Services; Marcy Correctional Facility, Justin J. Thomas, Superintendent; Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Abreu v. Lake et al
as 9:2017cv01312
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Mitch Lake, James F. Donahue, Justin J. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darling v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Darling
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Darling v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv09969
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Keith Darling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nash v. Diina et al
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Reeseie Nash
Defendant:
Thomas Diina, Sharon Galbo and Laura Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Toleman, et al
as 9:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael Cooper
Defendant:
C.O. Toleman, C.O. A. Konsul, C.O. Brockway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
