Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gross
Defendant:
James C Johnson and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05787
Plaintiff:
Frederick Walker
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, John Doe Agents of New York City, John Doe Agents of New York State at Downstate Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Fredericks v. Doe
as 6:2023cv06312
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
Nurse Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02600
Lead Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis and Frederick Ortiz
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Department of Correction (NYC), John Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Akshar
as 9:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Dupray A. Jordan
Respondent:
Frederick J. Akshar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fredericks v. Follacaro
as 23-159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nigel Naguan Fredericks
Defendant / Appellee:
Ninamarie Follacaro
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does and Jane Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
