Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rogers v. Fontaine et al
as 3:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Rachel Fontaine, Santiago, USman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Rachel Fontaine, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
DOCCS, Anthony Annucci, Central Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Warden et al
as 9:2021cv00062
Respondent:
Secretary, Warden, Field Office Director and others
Petitioner:
Fontaine Lavot Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riley v. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv04715
Petitioner:
Fontaine Lavot Riley
Respondent:
Warden, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fontaine v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 6:2019cv06335
Petitioner:
Jon T. Fontaine
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fontaine v. Ramineni et al
as 9:2015cv00432
Plaintiff:
Jon Fontaine
Defendant:
Subbarao Ramineni, Michael Cornwall, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Fadina et al
as 1:2011cv06394
Plaintiff:
Bryan Christian
Defendant:
Fadina, Fontaine and Peralta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakur v. Fontaine et al
as 3:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Mecca Allah Shakur
Defendant:
David Fontaine, Fisher, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontaine v. McMahon et al
as 1:2008cv00006
Plaintiff:
Derrick Fontaine
Defendant:
J. Michael McMahon, Clifford Kirsch, Chief Pro-Se Clerk S.D.N.Y. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
