Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irvin v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv04887
Petitioner:
Lature Irvin, Sr.
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. United States et al
as 9:2018cv00178
Defendant:
United States, Madison County D SS, Chittenango Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Irvin Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv00894
Plaintiff:
Roderick Irvin Baker
Defendant:
United States, State of New York, Madison County D SS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00178
Petitioner:
Irvin Lee Pope
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Irvin v. Chappious et al
as 1:2015cv03838
Petitioner:
Shaman Irvin
Respondent:
P. Chappious and Eric T. Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv03240
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Xiao-Ke Gao, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Marion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Attica Correctional Facility
as 1:2015cv00291
Petitioner:
Wayne Irvin
Defendant:
Attica Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lembhard v. Orange County Correctional Fac
as 14-1087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Calvin Irvin Lembhard
Defendant - Appellee:
Orange County Correctional Facility Medical Department, staff
Lembhard v. Orange County Correctional Facility
as 1:2014cv01724
Plaintiff:
Calvin Irvin Lembhard
Defendant:
Orange County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
