Cases 1 - 10 of 5,080
Bell v. Medbury et al
as 9:2024cv01144
Defendant:
William J. Snyder, Aleck J. Klerplec, Danielle C. Medbury and others
Plaintiff:
Amar Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mena v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv01145
Defendant:
Albert Gravlin, Keleher, W. Vesneske and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Maye et al
as 9:2024cv01105
Defendant:
J. Makee, Richard J. Damico, C. Liberty and others
Plaintiff:
Horace Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agee v. The Multipicity of Niagara County et al
as 6:2024cv06529
Defendant:
Jane Doe No. 2, John Doe No. 5, The Hon. Mrs. Caroline Wojtoszak and others
Plaintiff:
J'Kendric Jirelle Agee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Gado et al
as 3:2024cv01441
Defendant:
Dan, J. Healey, Maurotollo and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv06823
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Morrow and Stacy Bennett
Plaintiff:
Pedro Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Wilhelm et al
as 1:2024cv06826
Defendant:
Tiam Clarke, Daniel J Wadoloski, Isaac Maysonet and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora v. Lilley
as 2:2024cv06179
Respondent:
Lynn J. Lilley
Petitioner:
Felix Mora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nieman v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv01366
Defendant:
Cheney, Quiros, Reis and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Nieman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldron v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv06645
Defendant:
Montguri, Anthony Annucci, Debraccio and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Waldron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
