Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kane v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv00316
Petitioner:
Charles Kane
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Kane et al
as 1:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Thomas
Defendant:
Joseph Kane, Daniel Mandell, Jr., Weeden A. Wetmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zappulla v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv01598
Defendant:
Hearing Officer Kenneth Glenn, Correctional Officer Thatcher, Sergeant R. Kane and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Zappulla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kane-Lee v. Warden of Rikers Island
as 5:2020cv00036
Respondent:
Warden of Rikers Island
Petitioner:
Patricia Kane-Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kane-Lee v. Warden of Rikers Island
as 1:2020cv01256
Respondent:
Warden of Rikers Island
Petitioner:
Patricia Kane-Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kane v. Bennington County, Vermont et al
as 2:2018cv00070
Petitioner:
Patricia Kane
Respondent:
Howard, Goldstein and Lisa Menard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peacock v. Malloy et al
as 3:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
Randall Peacock
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Nancy Wyman, George Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
