Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Doe v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv03202
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ms. Dora B. Schriro, Louis Molina, Noel Merced and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, P.O. Diomede, John Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louime v. Camama et al
as 7:2021cv09594
Plaintiff:
David Louime
Defendant:
Tamie Camama, Pressley, P. Squire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merced v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06285
Defendant:
City of New York, Department of Corrections and C.O. John Doe
Plaintiff:
Nelson Merced
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. NYC DOCS et al
as 7:2012cv07028
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Defendant:
NYC DOCS, Dep. Perez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. NYC DOCS et al
as 1:2012cv07028
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Defendant:
NYC DOCS, Dep. Perez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasaun v. Wolf
as 12-3486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant:
Wardens, Chiefs, Captains and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard T. Wolf, Executive Director, Board of Corrections, Dora Shapiro, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, New York City and others
Rasaun v. Wolf
as 12-3486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard T. Wolf, Executive Director, Board of Corrections, Dora Shapiro, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, New York City and others
Defendant:
Wardens, Chiefs, Captains and others
Merced v. Canfield
as 1:2012cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jesus Merced
Defendant:
Wesley Canfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Labruzzo et al
as 1:2012cv04636
Plaintiff:
Askia Hinton
Defendant:
Labruzzo, Vaughn, Merced and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toliver v. City of New York
as 12-2086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michel Toliver
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Department of Corrections, Commissioner of the Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
