Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ahmed v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv08007
Plaintiff:
Ishtiaq Ahmed
Defendant:
Richard Taylor, Natasha Moseley-Jones, Viodelys Brathwaite and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Chief Court Administrator et al
as 3:2014cv01691
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Chief Court Administrator, Hilliary Strackbein, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moseley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00475
Defendant:
City of New York, Anselm Lezama, Douglas Moncayo and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moseley v. Lezama et al
as 1:2012cv05877
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective Anselm Lezama, Detective Douglas Moncayo and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Doe et al
as 3:2011cv01342
Plaintiff:
William Arnold
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeder v. Hogan
as 10-4388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Hogan, Commissioner, Office of Mental Health, Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Department of Correctional Services, Richard Roy, Inspector General and others
Reeder v. Artus et al
as 9:2009cv00575
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Dale Artus, Thomas Lavalle, Steven Racette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder v. Hogan et al
as 9:2009cv00520
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Michael Hogan, Brian Fischer, Richard Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lichtenthal v. Cortese et al
as 3:2007cv00957
Plaintiff:
Barry Lichtenthal
Defendant:
Emily Cortese, Omprakash Pillai, Patricia Wollenhaupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
