Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Ortiz-Ramos v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Ortiz-Ramos
Defendant:
Semple and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Ramos
Defendant:
Cheney, Cauley, Scagliarini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Vaughan-Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Victor Velasco
Defendant:
Vaughan-Williams, Losty, Hayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Churuk v. Ramos
as 3:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Yarslov Churuk
Respondent:
R Ramos and R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramos v. Poore et al
as 3:2022cv01533
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos
Defendant:
Corey Poore and James Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Victor L Ramos
Defendant:
Tiffany, John Doe and Randy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Thody et al
as 3:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Jason Thody, Joseph Mauro, Kevin Small and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
