Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Rahman v. Balanos et al
as 1:2023cv08168
Plaintiff:
Sha-Heed Rahman
Defendant:
Capt. Balanos, Asenceau and Capt. Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Phillip Rutherford
Defendant:
Warden C. Carter, Asst. Deputy Warden Santiago, Captain G. Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gudanowski v. John Doe, N.Y. State Trooper et al
as 7:2020cv00111
Defendant:
John Doe, N.Y. State Trooper and John Doe, East Rutherford N.J. Police Officer
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Gudanowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Touchette et al
as 2:2019cv00208
Plaintiff:
Theodore C. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Other Unknown Defendants, Michael Touchette and Joshua Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutherford v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv12049
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Rutherford
Defendant:
Doctor Raul Ulloa, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Menard et al
as 5:2018cv00204
Defendant:
Mark Potanas, Lisa Menard and Joshua Rutherford
Plaintiff:
David Cammie Cameron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutherford et al v. City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2018cv10706
Defendant:
City of Mount Vernon, Puff, P.O. Antonini and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gallman and Rayvon Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartshe v. Menard et al
as 2:2018cv00166
Defendant:
Marble Valley Regional Correctional Facility, Dr. Fischer, MD, Tom Giffin and others
Plaintiff:
James Bartshe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Menard et al
as 2:2018cv00123
Defendant:
John Does (1), Jane Does (2), David Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Veras et al
as 1:2018cv05904
Plaintiff:
Tonia' Scott
Defendant:
Flerida Veras, Mercer, Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
