Cases 1 - 10 of 295
Jackson v. DiNapoli
as 9:2024cv00954
Respondent:
Thomas DiNapoli
Petitioner:
Latief L. Jackson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. Wolcott
as 9:2024cv00806
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Petitioner:
Aaron Welch, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLaughlin v. Prine
as 6:2024cv06350
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Nicole Prine
Plaintiff:
Casey Joel McLaughlin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fate v. Yonkers Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv04100
Plaintiff:
Forest L. Fate, Sr.
Defendant:
The City of Yonkers Commissioner, Westchester County Commissioner and Yonkers Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughin v. Livingston County PD et al
as 6:2024cv06314
Defendant:
Livingston County PD and L. Babeswski Laslo
Plaintiff:
Casey McLaughin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughin v. Mount Morris PD et al
as 6:2024cv06302
Plaintiff:
Casey Joel McLaughin, Sr. and Casey Joel McLaughlin, Sr.
Defendant:
Mount Morris PD, Mathew Roegner, Ronald Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1, P.O. John Doe #2, Area Officer John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroud v. Doe et al
as 9:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Da'Shawn L. Stroud, Sr.
Defendant:
Common Wealth Place, John Doe and Chuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01703
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. New York State Parole
as 6:2024cv06026
Plaintiff:
Carl Norton, Sr.
Defendant:
New York State Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
