Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Young v. Garland et al
as 9:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle Young v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv05238
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of HHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
United States District Court and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamora v. Borough of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv07802
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gamora and Joshua Gumora
Defendant:
Borough of Prisons, MCC Staff and U.S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jimenez v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2022cv07685
Petitioner:
Jose Sanchez Jimenez
Respondent:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06667
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hajati v. Probation
as 3:2022cv00887
Petitioner:
Gerorge Hajati
Respondent:
United States Department of Probation, Bronx Community Reentry Center, U.S. Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
