Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Hill v. Katz et al
as 1:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
Melinda Katz, Jacob Saks, Police Officer Crociata Stefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Hill et al
as 6:2024cv06164
Petitioner:
Oswald McPherson
Respondent:
Superintendent Hill and DOCCS Commissioner Martuscello, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lissade v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
James Carl Lissade
Defendant:
Police Officer Romel Hill, Police Officer Elijah Boyle, Adrian Police Office Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Gardner et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Hill
Defendant:
Gardner, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oh v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Bamm Oh
Defendant:
Quiros, Jane Doe, Mike T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Government for the State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of New York and Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Government for the State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of New York and Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv11003
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
