Cases 101 - 110 of 452
Keita v. Fields
as 1:2020cv06154
Petitioner:
Mr. Mulbah Keita
Respondent:
Leroy Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mairs v. Fields
as 1:2020cv01451
Petitioner:
Oneil Mairs
Respondent:
Leroy Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Siler v. Monroe et al
as 7:2020cv05794
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Monroe, Superintendent Leroy Fields and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Siler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCollough v. Fields et al
as 1:2020cv05641
Defendant:
Correction Officer Garland, Superintendent Leroy Fields, Sergeant Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McCollough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windward Bora, LLC v. Dean Holding LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02929
Plaintiff:
Windward Bora, LLC
Defendant:
Leroy M. Frederick, Jr., Dean Holding LLC, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Peoples v. Harder
as 20-2067
Respondent:
Melinda Katz, David E. Harder and Anthony Annucci
Petitioner:
Leroy Peoples
Peoples v. Harder et al
as 1:2020cv02871
Respondent:
Melinda Katz, David E. Harder and Anthony Annucci
Petitioner:
Leroy Peoples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poole et al v. Bendixen et al
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Thomas Oelrichs, Jeff Raney, Randy Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 7, Charles C. Manner, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Peoples v. Harder et al
as 9:2020cv00692
Respondent:
Melinda Katz, David E. Harder and Anthony Annucci
Petitioner:
Leroy Peoples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd v. Silverman et al
as 7:2020cv03608
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Leroy Fields, Ann Marie McGrath and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
