Cases 111 - 120 of 139
Antrobus v. Atkins et al
as 1:2011cv01992
Plaintiff:
Andre Antrobus
Defendant:
Detective Phillip Atkins, City of New York, NYPD and others
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Menard et al
as 9:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
Michael Atkins
Defendant:
D. Menard , B. Hayes , Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00202
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Antrobus v. Atkins et al
as 1:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Andre Antrobus
Defendant:
Atkins, Unidentified Officers and NYPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00207
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Atkins v. Magic Sliders L.P.
as 1:2010cv09379
Plaintiff:
Todd C. Atkins
Defendant:
Magic Sliders L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Saintvil et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04904
Defendant:
Det. Atkins, Det. Cox, Det. Selwyn Fonro and others
Plaintiff:
Nahumy Jeanlouis, Kempes Saintvil and Mardoche Saintvil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Diah v. The State of New York et al
as 6:2010cv06592
Plaintiff:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Defendant:
C.O. Neth, Konkle Andrews , Sr., C.O. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazelton v. Yonkers Policeman Pons et al
as 7:2010cv03367
Plaintiff:
Akeem Hazelton
Defendant:
Yonkers Policeman Pons, Yonkers Policeman Foster, Yonkers Policeman Macias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hazelton v. Yonkers Policeman Pons et al
as 1:2010cv03367
Plaintiff:
Akeem Hazelton
Defendant:
Yonkers Policeman Pons, Yonkers Policeman Foster, Yonkers Policeman Macias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
