Cases 131 - 140 of 303
Uri Sasson et al V Howard Mann
as 7:2015cv06601
Counter Defendant:
Uri Sasson and Arnold Garelick
Defendant:
Howard Mann, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Philip Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mann et al v. United States of America
as 6:2015cv00645
Plaintiff:
William K. Mann, Jr. and Vicki Mann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Turner v. Children's Hospital Medical Center et al
as 2:2015mc00030
Plaintiff:
Lisa Turner
Defendant:
Children's Hospital Medical Center and Timothy Crombleholme
Movant:
Stephanie Mann
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Crichlow v. Fischer et al
as 6:2015cv06252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant:
Brian Fischer , Ellen Youssef , .John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Mann
as 1:2015cv02460
Defendant:
Warrel Mann
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leviov v. Mann et al
as 1:2015cv02332
Defendant:
Bridgewater Capital, Eddie Mann, Michael Mann and others
Plaintiff:
Shemaya Leviov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bamberg v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2015cv03133
Plaintiff:
Reynard Bamberg
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Julian Castro, Christopher Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Procom Supply, LLC v. Langner et al
as 1:2015mc00416
Defendant:
First National Management LLC, L and M Realty Brokers LLC, Mechel Langner and others
Plaintiff:
Procom Supply, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
