Cases 131 - 140 of 454
Burns v. Orange County Supreme Court
as 1:2019cv02247
Respondent:
Orange County Supreme Court
Petitioner:
George Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Chambers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv02145
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Burns Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Raja v. Burns et al
as 1:2019cv01328
Defendant:
The City of New York and John W. Burns
Plaintiff:
Rizwan Raja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fulton County Employees' Retirement System v. Blankfein et al
as 1:2019cv01562
Defendant:
Mark A. Flaherty, Adebayo O. Ogunlesi, Mark O. Winkelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fulton County Employees' Retirement System
Burns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Karen Yavonne Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Abiuso et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv12374
Plaintiff:
Dirk Delph, Erickson Christmas, Tyrone Anthony and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt
Berry et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12294
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERRY, Patricia Brandow, Robert Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Abreu et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12318
Plaintiff:
Michael Fabozzi, John Lampasone, Carol Robles-Roman and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
