Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv07019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hauter v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv03145
Plaintiff:
Moneef Hauter
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Phillips v. Gonzales
as 9:2007cv00738
Petitioner:
Ricardo Searles Phillips
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mikhnevich v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007mc06029
Plaintiff:
Uladzimir Mikhnevich
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Ganzalez and others
Zhang v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02772
Plaintiff:
Jianhong Zhang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Szykeruk et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv06184
Plaintiff:
April Szykeruk and Said Dandoune
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ljutica v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv06129
Plaintiff:
Rajko Ljutica
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Balkind v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02598
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Balkind
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
