Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Simcoe v. Miller
as 22-3028
Petitioner / Appellant:
Thomas B. Simcoe
Respondent / Appellee:
Christopher Miller
Cutts v. Miller
as 22-2825
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aljulah Cutts
Respondent / Appellee:
Christopher Miller, Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Vidal v. State of New York
as 22-2729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Vidal
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony Rodriguez, Acting Director of Special Housing Unit/Inmate Disciplinary Program, Eric Corbett, Food Service Administrator/Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
State of New York, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Phil Melecio, Deputy Superintendent for Programs and others
Carter v. Miller et al
as 9:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
Christopher Miller, Corey, Arquette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv07363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Staine v. Hochul et al
as 9:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Eric Staine
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Anthony Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv04369
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
Superintendent Christopher Miller, Superintendent Corey, C.O. Arquette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sposito v. Miller
as 9:2022cv00686
Petitioner:
Joseph Sposito
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. Miller
as 22-1382
Petitioner / Appellant:
Khari Devon Coley
Respondent / Appellee:
Christopher Miller, Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
