Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2010cv00329
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Ortiz, Daniel Ortiz and DLO Bar & Restaurant Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
Elmaghraby et al v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2004cv01809
Plaintiff:
Javaid Iqbal and Ehab Elmaghraby
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Scott Roseberry, David Rardin, Corrections Officer Michael Defrancisco and others
Counter Claimant:
Corrections Officer Reynaldo Alamo
Cross Claimant:
Corrections Officer Jai Jaikisson
Interested Party:
Ibrahim Turkmen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turkmen et al v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2002cv02307
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ahmer Abbasi, Anser Mehmood, Benamar Benatta and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Robert Mueller, James W. Ziglar and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
