Cases 11 - 20 of 38
McCain v. Shelby et al
as 6:2016cv06624
Plaintiff:
Adrian McCain
Defendant:
T. Shelby, J. Campbell and S. Echert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lilly v. Cullen et al
as 1:2015cv00874
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Lilly
Defendant:
Danny J. Cullen, Benjamin J. Campbell and New York State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valle v. Holder et al
as 1:2015cv04721
Plaintiff:
Israel Valle
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Ralph F. Boyd, Robert Moossy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv06728
Plaintiff:
Jamel J. Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Valle v. United States of America
as 13-2593
Petitioner:
Israel Valle
Respondent:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, George W. Bush and others
Valle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Israel Valle
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frommert v. Conkright
as 12-67
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul J. Frommert, Donald S. Foote, Thomas I. Barnes and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally L. Conkright, Xerox Corporation Pension Plan Administrator, Patricia M. Nazementz, Xerox Corporation Pension Plan Administrator, Xerox Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
