Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Allen v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11868
Plaintiff:
Laurie Allen, Reinaldo Gongora, John Esposito and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Amberman et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11724
Plaintiff:
Daniel Benbrook, Kevin Campbell, Patrick Wall and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Lupo v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01439
Plaintiff:
Michael Lupo
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lupo v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 6:2018cv06897
Plaintiff:
Michael Lupo
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banfield et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11346
Plaintiff:
Walter Jensen, Jose M. Burgos, Robert Toscano and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Sr., Christopher Bonin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Belton v. Wydra et al
as 3:2017cv02006
Plaintiff:
Daryl Belton
Defendant:
Timothy Wydra, John Sullivan, Bo Kicak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lupo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv01722
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Edward Francis Lupo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Aguilar et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2016cv09663
Plaintiff:
Luis Aguilar , James Alamia , Rena Alexander and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Binladin Group, Mohamed Binladin Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dorta v. Quinnipiac University et al
as 1:2016cv08761
Plaintiff:
E. Dorta
Defendant:
Quinnipiac University, Daniel Brown, Vincent Contrucci and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Lupo et al
as 2:2016cv04740
Defendant:
John Doe and Anthony Lupo
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
