Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Peterkin v. Pardon and Paroles
as 3:2019cv00497
Petitioner:
Doram Anthony Peterkin
Respondent:
Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Padilla v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2019cv00231
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Municipality of Dallas and Texas Prison Parole System or Prison System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Milner v. Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2018cv01119
Defendant:
John Doe, Jason Bedard, Carelton Giles and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanseverino v. Giles et al
as 3:2017cv02118
Plaintiff:
Pasquale Sanseverino
Defendant:
Carleton Giles, Scott Semple and Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The Texas U.S. District Courts Judges et al
as 6:2017cv06640
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Defendant:
The Texas U.S. District Courts Judges, The Texas Board Pardons and Paroles and The Texas Allan B. Polunsky Monitored Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Martin Melvin
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannon v. Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2015cv00541
Plaintiff:
Michael Hannon
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles, John DeFeo, Pamela Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Anderson et al
as 3:2014cv00728
Plaintiff:
Bruce D. Jefferson
Defendant:
Rick Anderson, Hartford Parole, Erika Tindall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fee v. McCluskey et al
as 3:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Fee
Defendant:
David McCluskey, Jennifer Zaccagnini, Begaina Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
