Cases 11 - 20 of 1,321
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner:
Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz et al v. Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
as 1:2024cv01969
Plaintiff:
Genesis Ruiz, Nohemy Arriola, Odilia Arriola and others
Defendant:
Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramos v. Almamlouh et al
as 1:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Ramos
Defendant:
Healthy Way Organic Market LLC, Rafik Salem Almamlouh and Abdul Hamid Alzahere
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Edwin E. Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joachin v. Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home
as 24-470
Plaintiff:
NADINE JOACHIN
Defendant:
MORNINGSIDE REHABILITATION NURSING HOME, WILLIAM FORD, JAMES LOKKO and others
Ogletree et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01171
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ogletree, Patty Paesch, Sharon Paruta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
United States of America v. Ramos
as 24-293
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ORTEXIS RAMOS
Ramos Aburto et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Ramos Aburto
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
