Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Salaverria v. The United States of America
as 22-1190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant / Appellee:
The United States of America, Department of Justice of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, (USDHS), Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Unidentified Agents Acting in the name of USDHS and others
Defendant:
Retired Agent Jeffrey James Mumaugh, Under Cover, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (ICE), Director Tae D. Johnson, All Arresting Officers, Present at Illegal Arrest, September 7, 2021 and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 22-728
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of California and others
Defendant:
Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Phoenixus AG and Kevin Mulleady, individually, as an owner and director of Phoenixus AG and as a former executive of Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
Martin Shkreli, individually, as an owner and former director of Phoenixus AG and as a former executive of Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
United States of America ex re v. Evicore Healthcare MSI, LLC.
as 22-530
Plaintiff:
ABC, State of Tennessee, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel. SW CHALLENGER, LLC, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant / Appellee:
Evicore Healthcare MSI, LLC.
Defendant:
DEF and WellCare Health Plans Inc.
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-116
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-85
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., Purdue Pharma, L. P., Purdue Pharma Inc and others
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-88
Petitioner:
Multi-State Governmental Entities Group
Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
