Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Impala v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 3:2018cv01622
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Justice, John Durham, John Bull Durham and others
Plaintiff:
Zee Wee J. Impala
Kapa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service et al
as 1:2017cv05119
Petitioner:
Mlu Kapa
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Jefferson B. Sessions, III and U.S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coston v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2016cv07087
Petitioner:
Rashod Coston
MDC-Brooklyn:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hutchins v. U.S. Dept. of Justice Special Litigation Unit
as 1:2015cv05682
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice Special Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hutchins v. Jacoby & Meyers et al
as 1:2015cv07510
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
Jacoby & Meyers, Cochran Firm, Joshua Bernstien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Impala v. U.S. Dept of Justice
as 3:2014cv01248
Plaintiff:
ZeeWee D. Impala
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coston v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2013cv07431
Plaintiff:
Rashod D. Coston
Bronx RRC:
Fed Bureau of Prisons and Community Corrections Center
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Peeler v. Justice
as 3:2011cv01370
Plaintiff:
Russell Peeler
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Peeler v. Justice et al
as 3:2011cv01261
Plaintiff:
Adrian Peeler
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice and Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
