Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Adedapo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarino, John Colella, Steven Steigelfest and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Milau v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2017cv06061
Defendant:
John Doe, Police Officer "John" Molinari, Captain William Scrima and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Milau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singleton v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv05455
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Singleton
Defendant:
City Of New York, Darian Shannon, Michael Gandolfi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rafiy et al v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2015cv06497
Defendant:
John and Jane Does #1-20, John and Jane Does #1-20, Emblemhealth, Inc./Group Health Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Long Island Spine & Orthopedics, P.C. and Philip M. Rafiy, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller et al v. Rice et al
as 2:2014cv02928
Defendant:
Anne Donnelly, William Napolitano, Kathleen A. Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Miller and Mary Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walsh v. ARS National Services, Inc.
as 7:2012cv08011
Plaintiff:
William Walsh
Defendant:
ARS National Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Walsh v. LTD Financial Services, L.P.
as 7:2012cv08010
Plaintiff:
William Walsh
Defendant:
LTD Financial Services, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DePaul v. McNamara et al
as 6:2010cv01123
Plaintiff:
Barton DePaul
Defendant:
Scott McNamara, Mark Curley and William Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seymour's Boatyard Inc. v. The Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor et al
as 2:2008cv01097
Plaintiff:
Seymour's Boatyard Inc.
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor, Frederick J. Dolan, Leland M. Hairr and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
